And if that's not a "logical" enough of a structure then you can skip the AST st... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

tel on March 25, 2015 | parent | context | favorite | on: Classp: a “classier” way to parse

And if that's not a "logical" enough of a structure then you can skip the AST step if you really like and parse directly into the final effect.

david-gudeman on April 2, 2015 [–]

By "logical structure" I mean the AST. I make this clear in the rest of the document. The point is, with Classp you don't have to write a grammar to create a parse tree and then convert to an AST; you write a specification that produces the AST directly.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact