>And they are less likely to create whole ideologies, political parties and movements that rationalize and defend all that abuse.

Women are less likely to create whole ideologies, political parties and movements as a general baseline.

I'm not sure they do evil shit any less once you account for that.

The topic is specifically sexual abuse, porn vs erotic books.

The commenter tried to play the "erotic romance books are as bad as hard core porn and no one is treating it that way" bullshit.

Women do create political ideologies and movements. They do participate in them too. The topic is specifically who is building and defending sexual abuse networks, who is invested more in defending right to abuse.

> And yet, women dont create whole networks of sexual abuse

That explains why women like Ghislaine Maxwell or Kat Torres don't exist I guess.

The fact the list ends at 2 women who were already named, when the men involved number in the hundreds and are still being protected, kind of ruins your point…

I've got plenty more if you want them. The fact that any exist at all is enough to prove that the statement "women dont create whole networks of sexual abuse" was a lie.

Ghislaine Maxwell was a part od male run male dominanted abuse network. The one which was supported by powerful men in goverment and politicians. Adult women were minority there.

Nice try. But while some women were part of Epstein network, overall it was male network. And pretty ideologically misogynistic at that.

I suspect erotic novels make it more likely for readers to become victims of abuse, if anything.