Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That would use more power because of losses in charging the batteries and standby loss in the battery themselves.

They could optimize for lower power. 0.3W seems pretty high, I would bet they could reduce that by a factor of 10 if they tried



Can you still send 802.11b/g/n with 0.03W power consumption?


These guys are doing it using just 0.00015W

http://supermechanical.tumblr.com/post/25189115532/its-all-o...

Of course it depends on how often you "call home" to check for any information. What might be acceptable for monitoring temperature would not work for a switch when you expect immediate response.


It might have been 0.03W. I’ll need to check again… It was either 0.3 or 0.03.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: