Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

A simple bomb does not have enough certainty that it will destroy its target without exerting exorbitant amounts of explosives.

Yes this strategy is much more complex but I would argue it has more precision and certainty around its efficacy.



I think the opposite is more likely. Put a bomb in a remote controlled car - you're going to need one either way - drive close to your target, detonate. Done.

With a machine gun you have to drive close and then aim extremely accurately.

It sounds implausible - at least not without AI superpowers in the targeting system.

At the very least you'd expect lag to be a significant problem.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: