Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | ObscureScience's commentslogin

Could be interesting to port as a Racket #lang

I'm not sure where I place AI (of the current family), but more than directly worry about the actions they may perform I'm actually more worried what affects their usage can have on us as individuals and society.


My employer uses CDN77. Only for serving static resources.


But do they offer even 10% of the features Cloudflare offers to free customers? To imply that Cloudflare is merely a fancy CDN is to miss the whole point.


It's the same issue as being cloud agnostic.

If you use their unique features, you're locking yourself in. Is it worth it?


I get it. I’ve consciously avoided that exact trap with AWS. But Cloudflare aren’t giving me “features” so much as they’re allowing my site, which is routinely DDOSed, the ability to remain online at all.


It would be interesting to research more into parameter analysis to learn more about what parameters a trained network has "extracted" that has the strongest predictive power; assuming the model itself has such preductive power. I guess I'm imagining some kind of alternative to embeddings where you get answers like: Predicted percipitation P(accumulated humidity over n days, net wind vector over n days, humity today, temperature today, ...)


That seems to be the case with linguistic- and group practices in general. It's not universal law, and while the overlap of correctness and even best practice is pretty big, there are still differences. Subject matter, language, abstract institution (universities), concrete ditto (Oxford, Chalmers, Max Planck IoT, Royal Academy of {country}), register/style (daily newspaper, tabloid), etc.



I think they must be? Windows 3.1 had depth. Win95 rammped it up in, what we all thought at the time, was a good way.

I have this really fond memory of showing my friend (who is still one of my good friends in adulthood) who had installed XP that he could change the theme "back" to look exactly 95/98/2000. His reaction was this very earnest "I love this..." as he clicked around like he was experiencing again for the first time. Anyway, ya, getting a bit off topic into memory lane, but we just had cool UIs back then.


This one was recently up in HN: https://dumbermini.com/


Yeah, why should it not be desireble to give them access to the good properties of such devices and the internet?


What are the good properties that justify giving kids smart phones?


How much of your current knowledge would you simply lack were it not for the Internet?


It is trivial for a parent to gather materials for the kids without exposing them to billions of strangers/companies with who knows what intent toward them.


I guess it could disable the killswitch


besides that.


"Value generation" is a term I would be somewhat wary of.

To me, in this context, it's similar to drive economic growth on fossil fuel.

Whether in the end it can result in a net benefit (the value is larger than the cost of interacting with it and the cost to sort out the mess later) is likely impossible to say, but I don't think it can simply be judged by short sighted value.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: